Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Brown v. Gault Financial, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00280
Defendant:
Gault Financial, LLC, Michael S Harb and Thompson & Booth
Plaintiff:
Richard Brown
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rosete v. Gault Financial, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00281
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Rosete
Defendant:
Gault Financial, LLC, Michael S Harb and Thompson & Booth
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fowkes et al v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2010cv13666
Defendant:
Wayne, County of and wayne county medical examiner
Plaintiff:
Linda Fowkes , Raymond Fowkes , S F and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Able v. Booth et al
as 5:2010cv00254
Plaintiff:
Clayton Able, Jr.
Defendant:
Janet Booth and Michael Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gentry v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2010cv11714
Defendant:
Wayne County, Daniel J. Carmona, Warren Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Laron Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Aldrich
as 1:2009cv11178
Plaintiff:
Marcia Kay Booth
Defendant:
Donald Aldrich, Michael Cecchini and Bay City, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Allen v. Booth et al
as 7:2008cv00135
Plaintiff:
Donnie Allen, II and Donnie Allen, II
Defendant:
Jim Booth and Jared Alfrey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Booth v. Coopersville Area Public Schools et al
as 1:2008cv00505
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Booth
Defendant:
Coopersville Area Public Schools, Brian Barrett, Steve Bennink and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCoy et al v. Booth et al
as 7:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Randall McCoy, Randall McCoy, Benita Damron and others
Defendant:
Jim Booth and Jared Alfrey
Cause Of Action: Diversity
James Grawey, et al v. T. Drury, et al
as 08-1064
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES GRAWEY and DAWN WENTWORTH
Defendant:
T. DRURY, City of Clare Police Lieutenant, S. DAVIS, City of Clare Police Auxilliary Officer, SENECA BOOTH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID SAAD, City of Clare Police Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
