Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Raines v. Carr et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00410
Plaintiff:
Sandra Raines
Defendant:
Ralph Carr , Jack H Baldwin and City of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dan Withers, et al v. City of Cleveland, et al
as 15-3110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN WITHERS, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Danny Withers and LAVETTE CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, et al., THOMAS SHOULDERS, DAVID SHAPIRO and others
Christopher Harvey v. Darryl Carr
as 14-6229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. HARVEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRYL CARR, solely in his individual capacity
Choiniere v. Carr et al
as 4:2014cv02141
Petitioner:
Bruno Choiniere
Respondent:
James G. Carr and Geri M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Patricia Andwan v. Village of Greenhills Ohio, et al
as 14-3759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA A. ANDWAN
Defendant - Appellee:
VILLAGE OF GREENHILLS OHIO, DAVID B. ADAMS, JANE A. BERRY and others
Dan Withers, et al v. City of Cleveland, et al
as 14-3538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN WITHERS, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Danny Withers and LAVETTE CARR
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER DANIEL ZOLA
Carr et al v. TransCanada USA Services, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01084
Plaintiff:
Danny Carr , James Ethridge and Bailey Hankins, Jr.
Defendant:
TransCanada USA Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harvey v. Carr
as 5:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Harvey
Defendant:
Darryl Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carr v. TransCanada USA Services, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00370
Plaintiff:
Danny Carr
Defendant:
TransCanada USA Services, Inc.
Counter_plaintiff:
TransCanada USA Services, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Danny Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Slagle et al v. Kresin et al
as 2:2013cv10728
Plaintiff:
Craig Slagle and Toni Slagle
Defendant:
James Kresin, D Torolski, A Hamilton and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
