Cases 61 - 70 of 109
Walter Dodd, Jr. v. Jerry Simmons, et al
as 15-6145
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WALTER EARL DODD, JR.
Defendant:
JERRY SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES PIERCE, Officer
Simmons v. Knox County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2015cv00425
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Dominique Simmons
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriff Office, Knox County, Harold Hayes Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simmons v. Berrien County Health Department et al
as 1:2015cv00710
Plaintiff:
Gaylene Simmons
Defendant:
Berrien County Health Department, Michael A. Mortimore, Shelly Jasper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Blocker v. Anglin et al
as 1:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
Janice June Blocker
Defendant:
Hunter Anglin and Jodi Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 14-2298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE ARTHUR J. TARNOW, BERNARD FREIDMAN, PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Ernest Howard-Bradley v. Carolyn Simmons, et al
as 14-3950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST HOWARD-BRADLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN L. SIMMONS, Associate Commissioner, CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, UNKNOWN FIDUCIARY AGENTS, 1-4 and others
Mario Simmons v. Dianna Napier, et al
as 14-2013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANNA NAPIER, MUSA MAHOI and DAVID VILLEROT
Van Heck v. White-Simmon et al
as 2:2014cv12679
Plaintiff:
Roger Van Heck
Defendant:
White-Simmon, David Cannon, Ruth Johnson and others
Howard-Bradley v. Simmons, et al
as 4:2014cv00869
Plaintiff:
Ernest Howard-Bradley
Defendant:
Carolyn L. Simmons, Carolyn W. Colvin, Unknown Fiduciary Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hochul et al
as 4:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Brian Avery Smith
Defendant:
William J. Hochul, Jr., Maura K. O'Donnell, Richard Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
