Voting Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kenneth Simon, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-3910
Plaintiff / Appellant: REVEREND KENNETH L. SIMON, REVEREND LEWIS W. MACKLIN, II and HELEN YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant / Appellee: MIKE DEWINE, Governor and Member of the Ohio Redistricting Commission, FRANK LAROSE, Secretary of State and Member of the Ohio Redistricting Commission, OHIO REDISTRICTING COMMISSION and others
Michael Banerian, et al v. Jocelyn Benson, et al
as 22-1399
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL BANERIAN, MICHON BOMMARITO, PETER COLOVOS and others
Defendant / Appellee: JOCELYN BENSON, Secretary of State, DOUGLAS CLARK, Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission, JUANITA CURRY, Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission and others
Agee, Jr. et al v. Benson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00272
Plaintiff: Donald Agee, Jr., Dennis Leory Black, Jr., Beverly Ann Burrell and others
Defendant: Jocelyn Benson, MICHIGAN INDEPENDENT CITIZENS REDISTRICTING COMMISSION, Douglas Clark and others
Interested Party: Common Cause and Jon X. Eguia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Banerian et al v. Benson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00054
Plaintiff: Michael Banerian, Peter Colovos, William Gordon and others
Defendant: Jocelyn Benson, Douglas Clark, Juanita Curry and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: Joan Swartz McKay, Grace Huizinga, Samantha Neuhaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Tennessee Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Lee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01039
Defendant: William Lee, Melissa Harrell, Tony C. Parker and others
Plaintiff: Curtis Gray Jr, Tennessee Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Lamar Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A. Philip Randolph Institute of Ohio, et al v. Larose We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01908
Plaintiff: Soli Collins, C. Ellen Connally, Sarah Rikleen and others
Defendant: Frank LaRose
Intervenor Defendant: Republican National Committee, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Ohio Republican Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
League of Women Voters of MI, et al v. Ruth Johnson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1437
Plaintiff - Appellee: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MICHIGAN, ROGER J. BRDAK, FREDERICK C. DURHAL, JR. and others
Defendant: RUTH JOHNSON, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State
Appellant: JACK BERGMAN, MIKE BISHOP, BILL HUIZENGA and others
League of Women Voters of Michigan et al v. Benson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv14148
Plaintiff: League of Women Voters of Michigan, William "Bill" J. Grasha, Roger J. Brdak and others
Defendant: Ruth Johnson, Republican Congressional Delegation, Lee Chatfield and others
Petitioner: William F. Carney, Jeff Cobb, Shelly Edgerton and others
Interested Party: Robert LaBrant, Michigan Chamber of Commerce, Robert I. Schostak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Tennessee et al v. Haslam et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00353
Plaintiff: State of Tennessee and Herbert S. Moncier
Defendant: Bill Haslam , Mark Goins , Robert E. Cooper, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
C-My-Casino, LLC et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00425
Plaintiff: C-My-Casino, LLC and Michigan Is Yours
Defendant: Ruth Johnson, Melissa Malerman and State Board of Canvassers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?