General Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Rickey Benson v. J. Fields and/or Subordinates, et al
as 24-5377
Plaintiff: RICKEY BENSON
Defendant: J. FIELDS, Chief Jailer and/or subordinates and DEPUTY WRIGHT
Wright v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00217
Petitioner: Darcel D. Wright
Respondent: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Wright et al.
as 1:2024cv00251
Petitioner: Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent: Sheriff Chuck Wright, Alan Wilson, Donald J. Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00221
Petitioner: Marcus D. Wright
Respondent: Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cameron Wright v. James Schiebner
as 23-2055
Petitioner / Appellant: CAMERON DAVON WRIGHT
Respondent / Appellee: JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden, Muskegon Correctional Facility
Wright v. Coleman I-USP
as 5:2023cv00256
Petitioner: Eric Christopher Wright
Respondent: Coleman I-USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. Mazza
as 1:2023cv00105
Petitioner: Preston Wright
Respondent: Warden Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. Warden
as 6:2023cv00086
Petitioner: Marcus D. Wright
Respondent: USP McCreary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright #715287 v. Schiebner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00472
Petitioner: Cameron Davon Wright #715287
Respondent: James Scheibner and James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. King
as 2:2023cv10756
Petitioner: Willie Charles Wright
Respondent: Christopher King

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?