Cases 1 - 10 of 720
GARRISON v. HAWKINS et al
as 2:2024cv02832
Petitioner:
Carlos Q Garrison
Respondent:
DANIEL HAWKINS, MICHAEL RUCKER, MATTHEW J. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Edwards v. Bradley
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kareem M. Edwards
Defendant:
Warden David Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVENPORT v. MILLER et al
as 2:2024cv02364
Petitioner:
AUSTIN R. DAVENPORT
Respondent:
ANDY D. MILLER, DANEL J. CABLE, ESRA BETUL OZTURK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson #229891 v. Miniard
as 1:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Joseph M. Johnson #229891
Respondent:
Gary Miniard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shawn Berila v. Tom Watson
as 24-3188
Petitioner:
SHAWN M. BERILA
Respondent:
TOM WATSON, Warden, North Central Correctional Complex
Robertson v. David Paul
as 5:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Demetrius M. Robertson
Respondent:
David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daramis Sharkey v. James Holloway
as 24-5145
Petitioner:
DARAMIS LEE SHARKEY
Respondent:
JAMES M. HOLLOWAY, Warden
Robertson v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M. Robertson
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Springer v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv02005
Petitioner:
Michael Shane Springer
Respondent:
United States of America, Collettee Peters, M. Fulgum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
