Cases 1 - 10 of 1,529
SMITH v. COCROFT et al
as 2:2024cv03215
Petitioner:
DEONDRE E. SMITH
Respondent:
Judge Kimberly Cocroft, JEFF ZEZECH, GEORGE WHARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBISON v. WENGER et al
as 2:2024cv03219
Petitioner:
BRADLEY C. ROBISON
Respondent:
BEAU D. WENGER, David C Young, COLIN E. PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
David MacLloyd v. USA
as 24-1505
Petitioner:
DAVID ERIKE MACLLOYD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stickney v. Warden David Paul of Federal Medical Center Lexington
as 5:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Brian Thomas Stickney
Respondent:
Warden David Paul of Federal Medical Center Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
David Feathers v. Stephen Reynolds
as 24-3466
Petitioner:
DAVID E. FEATHERS
Respondent:
STEPHEN REYNOLDS, Warden
Edwards v. Bradley
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kareem M. Edwards
Defendant:
Warden David Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kuhl et al v. Garland
as 1:2024cv00485
Petitioner:
Thomas Benjamin Kuhl and David James Kuhl
Respondent:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thomas v. Green
as 0:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Tarell Thomas
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Blakeley v. Shelby County Correctional Center
as 2:2024cv02215
Petitioner:
Michael David Blakeley
Respondent:
Shelby County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
