Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Chester Wallace v. Lt. Haveman, et al
as 12-6174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHESTER L. WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. HAVEMAN, Hamilton County, CO. WILLIAMSON, Hamilton County, SGT. TERRELL, Hamilton County and others
Carmichael v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2012cv13594
Plaintiff:
Karlos Carmichael
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Nick Ludwick, Scott L Holmes and others
Hughes v. Hammond et al
as 1:2012cv00268
Plaintiff:
Thomas L Hughes, Jr
Defendant:
Jim Hammond and John Julian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Hammonds et al
as 1:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
Terry W Fuller
Defendant:
Teressa J Hammonds, Sheriff John Doe and Lt. Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deleon v. Hamilton County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Alberto E Deleon
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee, Jim Hammond, Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rueben Herrerra, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 11-2173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUEBEN HERRERRA and RICO MENEFEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, JAMES ARMSTRONG and others
Rueben Herrerra, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 11-2128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUEBEN HERRERRA and RICO MENEFEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, JAMES ARMSTRONG and others
Roberts v. Reece et al
as 2:2011cv00189
Plaintiff:
William Clinton Roberts
Defendant:
Mike Reece, Rose Hammonds and Mindy Forrester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings #423843 v. Ventocilla et al
as 1:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
Keith Tyrone Cummings #423843
Defendant:
Mark Ventocilla, Larry Mason, Unknown McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hammond et al
as 1:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Antonio T Smith
Defendant:
Jim Hammond , Byron Knight , Justin Tabor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
