Cases 1 - 10 of 176
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5258
Plaintiff:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Penley v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Cody Penley
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion, Sharon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5302
Plaintiff:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settles, et al
as 23-5731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant / Appellee:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02250
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Shelby County Sheriff Office Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibrihim v. Settles et al
as 2:2022cv02847
Plaintiff:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Defendant:
Dewun Settles, Warden Shelby County Corrections, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Reeves
as 1:2021cv01111
Plaintiff:
Bobby Armstrong
Defendant:
SGT. FNU Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mounday v. Wellpath Corporation LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Connell Mounday
Defendant:
Nurse Mefford, Nurse Price, Nurse Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crowe v. Harris et al
as 2:2018cv02886
Defendant:
Female Nurse Moore, Mitchell, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Neal Crowe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #225987 v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2017cv00554
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Smith #225987
Defendant:
Zoraida G. Armstrong, Eddie Jenkins and Corizon Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
