Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Vanwinkle v. Sgt Sizemore et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Donald Vanwinkle
Defendant:
Sgt Sizemore, C.O. Roberts, R.N. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Gomez et al
as 6:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Bradley, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Gomez, Brandon Perry, Patti Ann Land and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Combs v. Fields et al
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Adam Combs
Defendant:
Lieutenant Hilton Humphrey and Marc L. Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse et al v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 5:2021cv12670
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Rouse, John Moore, David Sarfo and others
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, State of Michigan, MDOC and others
Combs v. Fields et al
as 2:2021cv00073
Defendant:
John Varnado doing business as Trinity Foods, Inc., Marc L. Fields and Kenton County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Adam Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant #463608 et al v. Horton et al
as 2:2020cv00131
Plaintiff:
James Randle #224414, Kevin Weems #156780, Roger Ray #231180 and others
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Connie Horton and Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs vs Jailer
as 6:2020cv00085
Plaintiff:
John Combs
Defendant:
Jailer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shoults v. Randy White, et al
as 3:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Adam B. Shoults
Defendant:
Randy White, Terry Peede, Steven Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wittman #799434 v. Reaume et al
as 1:2015cv00254
Plaintiff:
Brian Wittman #799434
Defendant:
Rosemary Reaume , R. Davonport , Rick Raymond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Crowell v. MI, et al
as 14-2399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD CROWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, RICK SNYDER, Governor, PATRICIA CARUSO, Former Corrections Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
