Cases 11 - 20 of 236
King v. Arbor Drugs, Inc.
as 2:2022cv13141
Plaintiff:
Carla King
Defendant:
Arbor Drugs, Inc. a domestic for profit corporation Doing business as CVS Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Schaffer v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
CARLA J. SCHAFFER
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woolfolk v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04036
Plaintiff:
Carla Woolfolk
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McGlade v. Hoffman Media, LLC
as 2:2022cv11698
Plaintiff:
Donna McGlade, Mary Hoemke and Carla Keaner
Defendant:
Hoffman Media, LLC
Malutic v. Ath Wonder Consulting LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Lisa Malutic
Defendant:
Ath Wonder Consulting LLC, Carl Douglas Priddy, Carla Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Rosado et al v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02077
Plaintiff:
Chan Rosado and Carla Rosado
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coward et al v. Richard Snyder et al
as 5:2020cv10307
Plaintiff:
E. B., Monica Embeck, Romell Barkus and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Michael Prysby, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benoit v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04850
Plaintiff:
Carla Benoit
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lucente v. Eynon
as 2:2021cv12277
Plaintiff:
Carla Lucente
Defendant:
Blaine Eynon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcum et al v. PNC Bank, National Association et al
as 3:2021cv00289
Defendant:
C. Robert Marcum, Rob and PNC Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Sandra M. Smithers, Joel Todd Marcum and Carla M. Deddens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
