Cases 101 - 110 of 1,423
Lutfi Saalim v. Walmart, Inc., et al
as 23-3217
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUTFI SAID SAALIM
Defendant / Appellee:
WALMART, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, LUCAS COUNTY, OH BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, on behalf of Lucas County, Ohio and others
Doe v. Webster County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Webster County, Kentucky, Greg Sauls and Aaron Drewicz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
Guess v. The City of Paducah et al
as 5:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
David Guess
Defendant:
The City of Paducah, Mayor George Bray, Commissioner Sandra Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Wilson v. City of Sidney, Ohio et al
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Wilson
Defendant:
City of Sidney, Ohio, William Balling, James O Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McComb v. Best Buy Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Robert S. McComb
Defendant:
Best Buy Inc., Annah Jane Doe, Dorian John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heidi Hall, et al v. Thomaca Bush, et al
as 23-1034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEIDI HALL and JOSEPH HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMACA BUSH, STACEY STROUSE, SIDRA ALVI-WALLER and others
Jacobs et al v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10088
Plaintiff:
Brian Jacobs, Rivka Jacobs, Gabriella Jacobs and others
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
