Cases 11 - 20 of 142
Deering v. Oakland County et al
as 2:2022cv11809
Plaintiff:
Juwan Deering
Defendant:
Oakland County, David Wurtz, Denise Reis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Dannah v. Grand Rapids, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00385
Plaintiff:
FAHIRRI DANNAH
Defendant:
City of Grand Rapids, OFFICER ANTHONY BARBERINO, OFFICER HARVEY BARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lillibridge v. Harvey
as 1:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Amy Victoria Lillibridge
Defendant:
Brandon Jon Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Harvey v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Tyris L Harvey
Defendant:
Bill Lee, David Rausch, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harvey v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jon Harvey
Defendant:
United States of America and Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Harvey v. City of Sterling Heights et al
as 2:2021cv12926
Plaintiff:
Veronica Harvey
Defendant:
City of Sterling Heights, Kevin Archer, Julian Arche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mockeridge et al v. Harvey et al
as 1:2021cv12896
Plaintiff:
Michael J Mockeridge and Susan J Mockeridge
Defendant:
Harry Harvey, Alcona, County of, Carolyn Brummund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Michigan Secretary of State
as 1:2021cv00707
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jon Harvey
Defendant:
Michigan Secretary of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Lillibridge
as 1:2021cv00661
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jon Harvey and Thomas Mason Harvey
Defendant:
Amy Victoria Lillibridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
