Cases 11 - 20 of 150
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Nolan et al v. Wetzel et al
as 2:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
Kathryn L. Nolan and Ann Vosburg
Defendant:
Richard D. Wetzel, Kathy Smedley, Paul John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong et al v. Campbell County and Municipal Planning and Zoning Commission et al
as 2:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
David Armstrong, Jenelle Armstrong, Angela Siry and others
Defendant:
Campbell County and Municipal Planning and Zoning Commission, Chair C.J. Peters, Larry Barrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronald Waddell, Jr. v. Greeneville, TN Police Department, et al
as 23-5215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD RICHARD WADDELL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
GREENEVILLE, TN POLICE DEPARTMENT, MATTHEW STANLEY, Officer, ERIC SCOTT, Officer and others
Armstrong v. Verizon Wireless
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Richard Armstrong
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carswell v. Armstrong
as 2:2022cv12097
Plaintiff:
Rodney Eugene Carswell
Defendant:
Vanessa Maria Armstrong
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Waddell v. Greeneville Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
Ronald Richard Waddell, Jr.
Defendant:
Greeneville Police Department, Matthew Stanley, Eric Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
