Cases 11 - 20 of 142
Fowler v. 17th Judicial Drug Task Force et al
as 4:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Holmes Fowler
Defendant:
17th Judicial Drug Task Force, Shane George and Bedford County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
William Wizinsky, et al v. Leelanau Township, MI, et al
as 22-1714
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM G. WIZINSKY and ANN M. WIZINSKY
Defendant / Appellee:
LEELANAU TOWNSHIP, MI, SHORES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, THEODORE SETH KOCHES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holloway #159258 v. Bell et al
as 1:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Randy Holloway #159258
Defendant:
Robert Holmes Bell, Timothy P. Greeley and Solomon Radner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holmes v. Lakefront at West Chester, LLC
as 1:2021cv00505
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Holmes
Defendant:
Lakefront at West Chester, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Holmes v. Lakefront at West Chester, LLC
as 1:2021cv00443
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Holmes
Defendant:
Lakefront at West Chester, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
