Cases 11 - 20 of 476
Russell et al v. The City of Franklin, Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Brian Russell, Marvin Young and Jeremy Slayden
Defendant:
The City of Franklin, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chapman v. Franklin County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Tasha Chapman
Defendant:
Franklin County Board of Commissioners, Commissioner John O'Grady, Kevin L Boyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hague v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jannah Hague
Defendant:
Kent County, Michelle LaJoye-Young, Kent County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Christopher Pascoe v. Thomas Young, et al
as 23-5909
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER PASCOE
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS YOUNG, JOEY BOARD, JUDGE BRUCE BUTLER, Breckinridge Circuit Court and others
Robert Carroll v. Troy Young, et al
as 23-5884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT T. CARROLL
Defendant / Appellee:
TROY YOUNG, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as a City of Russell Springs police officer and CITY OF RUSSELL SPRINGS, KY, in its official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
