Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv11167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Banerian, et al v. Jocelyn Benson, et al
as 22-1399
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BANERIAN, MICHON BOMMARITO, PETER COLOVOS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOCELYN BENSON, Secretary of State, DOUGLAS CLARK, Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission, JUANITA CURRY, Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission and others
Curry, Jr. v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Raymond Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Shiseido Americas Corporation, City of Obetz Police Department, Franklin County, Ohio Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Watson et al
as 3:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Raymond Evans
Defendant:
Jamie Watson, Brandon Purnell and Logan Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry et al v. Jerome Township, Ohio
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Curry, Vivian Curry and AMH Development
Defendant:
Jerome Township and Jerome Township, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Theodoro et al v. Department of Children and Families - Middletown, CT et al
as 3:2021cv00860
Plaintiff:
Isabella Theodoro and Peter Theodoro
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families - Middletown, CT, Vanessa Dorante, David Friend and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
