Cases 21 - 30 of 1,405
Bronson v. Martin
as 1:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bronson
Defendant:
Mark Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Arthur v. Krause et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Danielle Arthur
Defendant:
Douglas Krause and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Erbert v. Troy Design & Manufacturing Co.
as 2:2024cv10233
Plaintiff:
Daniel Erbert
Defendant:
Troy Design & Manufacturing Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis et al v. Berrien, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis, Sr., Charase Dorsey, Anisha Bird and others
Defendant:
Berrien, County of, Steve Pierangeli, Mark Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Porter v. Blalock et al
as 5:2024cv10226
Plaintiff:
Tenecia Porter
Defendant:
Thomas Blalock, Daniel Mercer, McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Leschinski v. Canton, Township of et al
as 2:2024cv10012
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Leschinski
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF CANTON, OFFICER BRANDON HAYFORD, ALEXIS DIVETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Satkowiak v. McLain et al
as 1:2023cv13096
Plaintiff:
Paul Satkowiak
Defendant:
Danielle McLain, Unknown EGLE Agent No. 1, Unknown EGLE Agent No. 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matlock v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Charles Matlock
Defendant:
Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government, Jerry Collins, Sgt. Samuel Colley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
