Cases 21 - 30 of 207
Hall-Rayford et al v. Owens et al
as 2:2022cv12714
Plaintiff:
Mary Hall-Rayford, Karen Beltz, Karen Mouradjian and others
Defendant:
Monique Owens and Eastpointe, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Patton v. Wicks et al (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Mark A Patton
Defendant:
Jeffrey Wicks, Bowden Ladd, Samantha Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Patton v. Samantha Turner, et al
as 22-5341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK A. PATTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMANTHA TURNER, BRANDON OWENS and COMMUNITY PROBATION SERVICES
Mark Patton v. Samantha Turner, et al
as 22-5332
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK A. PATTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMANTHA TURNER, BRANDON OWENS and COMMUNITY PROBATION SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coffey v. Freeport, City of et al
as 2:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Ann Coffey
Defendant:
Freeport, City of, Bay View, City of, Munson Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Thomsen v. Sullivan County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomsen
Defendant:
Sullivan County, Tennessee, City of Bristol, Tennessee, James Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
