Cases 31 - 40 of 150
Pelusio et al v. Knox County et al (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00323
Plaintiff:
Brent Pelusio and monica pelusio
Defendant:
Knox County, Knox County Board of Education, John Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Henderson v. Porter et al
as 3:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Ernest Henderson
Defendant:
Judge Jennifer E. Porter, Chief Circuit Judge Monica K. Meredith, Paulita Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Monica Conyers v. Cathy Garrett, et al
as 22-1494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONICA A. CONYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHY M. GARRETT and DANA NESSEL, Michigan Attorney General
v. Conyers
as 2:2022cv11151
Defendant:
Monica Conyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conyers v. Garrett
as 2:2022cv11152
Plaintiff:
Monica Conyers
Defendant:
Cathy M. Garrett and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendez v. AT&T Inc.
as 2:2022cv11010
Plaintiff:
Monica L. Mendez
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., Michigan Bell Telephone Company and AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
v. City of Detroit, a municipal corporation et al
as 2:2022cv10447
Defendant:
City of Detroit, a municipal corporation, Family Dollar Store Corporation, Matthew Jordan Green-Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Sherrod-Lugo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ward v. County of Wayne et al
as 2:2021cv12742
Plaintiff:
Ramon Ward
Defendant:
County of Wayne, Robert Agacinski, Nancy Westveld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
