Cases 41 - 50 of 135
Pilot v. Johnson et al
as 5:2018cv11097
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Pilot
Defendant:
Ruth Johnson, Charles G Goedert, Hazel Park, City of and others
Brock v. The United States et al
as 1:2017cv00254
Plaintiff:
Perry L. Brock
Defendant:
The United States , The Department of Justice , 9 Officers of the Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tisdale et al v. Department of Justice, et al
as 1:2017cv01801
Plaintiff:
Richard R. Tisdale
Defendant:
Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Kentucky One Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00359
Plaintiff:
Artis Anderson
Defendant:
Kentucky One Health, Inc. , Kentucky Court of Justice , United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Irvin v. William Haynes, Jr., et al
as 17-5612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., Senior United States District Judge, THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
St. John v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv00736
Plaintiff:
Lars St. John
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and Peter Elliott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wang v. Obama et al
as 2:2016cv01182
Plaintiff:
Hong Wang
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Loretta Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Medved v. U.S. Department of Justice et al.
as 4:2016cv02334
Plaintiff:
John Edward Medved
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fletcher v. Grant et al
as 3:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
David Fletcher
Defendant:
Jim Grant, Kevin Koback and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
