Cases 61 - 70 of 160
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Devin Branch, et al v. Christopher Pitts, et al
as 17-3243
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEVIN BRANCH, KELVIN ERBY and TRACY UDRIJA-PETERS
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER PITTS, EARNEST SMITH, KHADIJAH GUY and others
Frederick Banks v. CIA, et al
as 17-3225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MARK HORNAK, Judge, ROBERT CESSAR, AUSA and others
State of Ohio et al v. Pitts et al
as 1:2017cv00385
Petitioner:
Devin Branch , Kelvin Erby and Tracy Udrija-Peters
Respondent:
Christopher Pitts , Earnest Smith , Khadijah Guy and others
3rd_pty_defendant:
Nathaniel Martin and Barbara J. Thomas
3rd_party_plaintiff:
Christopher Pitts , Belinda Kyle , Brandon King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gaddy et al v. Land et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddy and Carol Gaddy
Defendant:
George Dwain Land , Clayton Smith , Chad Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
