Cases 71 - 80 of 160
McAllister v. Francis et al
as 4:2016cv13859
Plaintiff:
Dana McAllister [E-Filer]
Defendant:
Mark Francis, Marcia Young, FYI-CSI, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv13589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cahill-Lujan v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Roberta Ann Cahill-Lujan
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee and Nicholas Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Forsey et al v. Loeks Theatres, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01016
Defendant:
Loeks Theatres, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Graham Forsey and National Association of the Deaf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Amanda Sumpter v. Wayne County, et al
as 16-2102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMANDA SUMPTER, on behalf of herself and all similarly situated female inmates of the Wayne County Jail
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE COUNTY, SHERIFF BENNY NAPOLEAN, in his Official Capacity as Wayne County Sheriff and OFFICER TERRY GRAHAM, in her Individual Capacity; jointly and severally
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 4:2016cv01222
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Mark Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowery v. Brantley et al
as 3:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bowery
Defendant:
Graham Brantley and City of Sevierville, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goode v. The City of Southaven et al
as 2:2016cv02029
Plaintiff:
Kelli Denise Goode
Defendant:
The City of Southaven, City of Southaven Police Department, Todd Baggett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv14340
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allard et al v. Michigan House of Representatives
as 1:2015cv01259
Plaintiff:
Keith Allard and Benjamin Graham
Defendant:
Michigan House of Representatives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
