Cases 1 - 10 of 169
Arraf et al v. Michigan Democratic Party et al
as 1:2024cv00933
Defendant:
Michigan Democratic Party, Lavora Barnes and Christine Jensen
Plaintiff:
Madeleine Tocco, Huwaida Arraf and Jennifer Kirby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Tasha Chapman v. Justin Davis, et al
as 24-3660
Defendant:
HEELS HOMES LTD, Landlord, 4 REAL ESTATE, Corey Barnes, CONSULTANTS TO GOVERNMENT AND INDUSTRY INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
TASHA CHAPMAN
Tasha Chapman v. Justin Davis, et al
as 24-3594
Defendant:
4 REAL ESTATE, Corey Barnes, HEELS HOMES LTD, Landlord, CONSULTANTS TO GOVERNMENT AND INDUSTRY INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
TASHA CHAPMAN
Tasha Chapman v. Justin Davis, et al
as 24-3595
Defendant:
HEELS HOMES LTD, Landlord, 4 REAL ESTATE, Corey Barnes, JUSTIN DAVIS, VP of HCV Program and others
Plaintiff:
TASHA CHAPMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3576
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barnes v. City of Cleveland, Ohio et al.
as 1:2024cv01000
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Clerk of Courts, State of Ohio, City of Cleveland, Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Barnes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ledesma v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2024cv11432
Defendant:
Emily C Ellis, NP, Lila S Ali, Laneshia R Eaddy and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ledesma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnes v. Athens
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Denise Barnes
Defendant:
City of Athens and City of Athens, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barnes v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) INC. et al
as 4:2023cv12897
Plaintiff:
Robert Barnes
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) INC., Renaissance Center Management Company, General Motors, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
