Cases 1 - 10 of 864
Estate of Shameelah Chambers et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv12361
Defendant:
Grand Prairie Healthcare Services, P.C., Detroit, City of, Lt. M. Fenn and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Shameelah Chambers and LaToya Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Okojie v. Allen et al
as 3:2024cv01089
Plaintiff:
Richeena Okojie
Defendant:
Sheriff's Office Booking, E. Lopez, f/n/u Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kennedy v. Benson
as 2:2024cv12375
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12347
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Watkins v. Packaging Corporation of America et al
as 1:2024cv00910
Defendant:
Christopher Mullins and Packaging Corporation of America
Plaintiff:
Mikayla (f/k/a Robert) Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights: Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Davis v. Brudzinski et al.
as 3:2024cv01421
Defendant:
Nancy L. Jennings, Markus Finley, Raymond Alfred Runner and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brian Alford v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 24-3694
Defendant:
DOCTOR CARLSON, R. WINGATE, GEORGE CRUTCHFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH ALFORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
