Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sams v. City of Norton, et al
as 5:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Jason Sams
Defendant:
Norton, City of, Robert Fowler, Mayor Michael Zita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Theodoro et al v. Department of Children and Families - Middletown, CT et al
as 3:2021cv00860
Plaintiff:
Isabella Theodoro and Peter Theodoro
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families - Middletown, CT, Vanessa Dorante, David Friend and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Theodoro et al v. State of Connecticut Department of Children and Families, The
as 3:2020cv00993
Plaintiff:
Isabella Theodoro and Peter Theodoro
Defendant:
The State of Connecticut Department of Children and Families, Diana Fragomeni, Alyssa Glasow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore et al v. City of Cleveland
as 1:2018cv01849
Plaintiff:
Daniel Perstin, Anthony Burdette, James Johnson and others
Defendant:
City of Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Foster et al
as 5:2018cv01870
Defendant:
City of Barberton, Ohio, Clerk of Courts Diana Stevenson, Officer John Pond and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Counter Defendant:
Marybeth Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Currie v. Andrews et al
as 2:2016cv14153
Plaintiff:
Marlon Currie
Defendant:
Thomas Andrews, Michigan, State of, United States of America and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tyrone Davidson v. State of Michigan, et al
as 09-2119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE D. DAVIDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS and others
Davidson v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2008cv13761
Plaintiff:
Tyrone D Davidson
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Supreme Court, Michigan Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
