Civil Rights Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 309
Smith v. Alexander et al
as 2:2024cv02302
Plaintiff: Ricky Ricardo Smith
Defendant: Virginia M. Alexander, Robert Duck and Janeen R. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dominguez et al v. Gogebic, County of et al
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff: Dario Dominguez, Adam Kangas, Tammy Kronschnabel and others
Defendant: Gogebic County, Lisa Hewitt and Sue Pertile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Kallmeyer v. Mathews
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff: Alexander Kallmeyer
Defendant: Samuel Mathews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10662
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pendleton v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff: Eric C. Pendleton
Defendant: Randy Kennedy, Elizabeth A. Johnson, Andra Hedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Meigs County Government et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff: NATHAN ALEXANDER SMITH
Defendant: MEIGS COUNTY GOVERNMENT and ROBERT J LEONARD
Intervenor: Kenneth Andrew Colbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3007
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff: TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01273
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?