Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Knox v. Lexington Police Department
as 5:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Abner J. Knox
Respondent:
Lexington Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01446
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Pethtel et al v. State of Tennessee Department of Children's Services et al
as 3:2010cv00469
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Elaine Pethtel and Tobias Mark Pethtel
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Department of Children's Services, Anderson County CASA, Anderson County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Abner, et al v. Saginaw County, MI., et al
as 09-2362
Plaintiff:
JAMES ABNER, III, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB CORONADO
Defendant - Appellee:
SAGINAW COUNTY, MI., et al
James Abner, III, et al v. Saginaw County, MI., et al
as 09-2365
Plaintiff:
JAMES ABNER, III, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL DELANEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SAGINAW COUNTY, MI., et al
Will Abner, Jr. v. Terry Collins, et al
as 09-3510
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILL C. ABNER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY T. COLLINS, Director, in his capacity of Assistant Director of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, REGINALD WILKINSON, in his capacity as Director of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and JOHN/JANE DOE 1 THROUGH 10, in their capacity as Parole Board Members with the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Willis-Abner et al v. Parsons
as 2:2007cv12936
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Willis-Abner and LA
Defendant:
Parsons
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
