Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bertha Batey v. Metropolitan Government Dept, et al
as 16-6467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERTHA BATEY
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF CODES, PROPERTY STANDARDS and METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE
Batey v. Metropolitan Government Department of Codes Property Standards
as 3:2016cv02377
Plaintiff:
Bertha Batey
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government Department of Codes, Property Standards and Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv12138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Weston v. City of Oak Grove
as 5:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
Bertha Weston
Defendant:
City of Oak Grove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sligh et al v. Genesee ValleyCenter Merchants Association et al
as 2:2013cv11054
Plaintiff:
Bertha Sligh and Terey Lee
Defendant:
Genesee ValleyCenter Merchants Association, IPC International Corporation, Sergeant Ellis and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bertha Batey v. AMERIGROUP Tennessee, Inc.
as 11-5585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERTHA BATEY
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERIGROUP TENNESSEE, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
