Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Gerlach et al v. Mackinac, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Eve Hunt, Raymond Gerlach, Janice Barrera and others
Defendant:
Mackinac, County of, Jennifer Goudreau, Nora A. Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forte et al v. AT&T Phones et al
as 5:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Joe Forte, Cecil Guye, Tyrese Wimberly and others
Defendant:
AT&T Phones and Hopkinsville, KY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
O'Brien v. Morrison
as 2:2022cv02805
Plaintiff:
Administrator Chelsea O'Brien
Defendant:
Cecil A. Morrison, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snowden v. Kiper et al
as 3:2020cv00720
Plaintiff:
Cecil Snowden, IV
Defendant:
Timothy Raeber and Major Keith Kiper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jetter et al v. City of Cincinnati
as 1:2020cv00581
Plaintiff:
Alberta Harris, Dennis Howell, Cecil Howell and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dabney v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2020cv10329
Plaintiff:
Javon Dabney
Defendant:
Detective Patrick Cecile, Detective Donald Owen, Police Officer Derrick King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Knuth et al v. St.Joseph, City of et al
as 1:2019cv01044
Defendant:
Cecil Derringer and St. Joseph, City of
Plaintiff:
Dennis Knuth, Bailey & Biddle, LLC and Aaron Knuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. City of Memphis, et al
as 2:2019cv02776
Plaintiff:
Marc Joseph Henderson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, et al, Colonel Darryl Sheffield, Lieutenant Glenn Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Robinson v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00804
Plaintiff:
Cecil Robinson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
