Cases 1 - 10 of 8,279
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Barber v. Patznick et al
as 2:2024cv03195
Plaintiff:
Loren Barber
Defendant:
Chance Patznick and City of Newark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wattenbarger v. City of Crossville, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wallace Shane Wattenbarger
Defendant:
City of Crossville, Tennessee, Officer Samantha Seay, Officer Ethan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foster v. Warren, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11513
Plaintiff:
Anisha Foster
Defendant:
Warren, City of and David Gifford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hokenson v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Hokenson
Defendant:
Lansing, City of, Bryce Dawsey, Jim Smiertka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. City of Middleton, TN
as 1:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Johnny Richard Powers, Jr
Defendant:
City of Middleton, TN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Richmond Road Partners, LLC, et al v. City of Warrensville Heights, OH, et al
as 24-3502
Plaintiff:
RICHMOND ROAD PARTNERS, LLC and STEP FORWARD
Defendant:
CITY OF WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH, CITY OF WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH PLANNING COMMISSION and CITY OF WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH BUILDING COMMISSIONER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Russell #747638 v. Fisk et al
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Andrew Michael Russell #747638
Defendant:
Chad Fisk, Jonathan Kraai, Natascha Hirdes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
