Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Blount Pride, Inc et al v. Desmond et al
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Blount Pride, Inc and Matthew Lovegood
Defendant:
Ryan K Desmond, James Berrong, Tony Crisp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blount Pride, Inc et al v. Desmond et al
as 3:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Blount Pride, Inc and Matthew Lovegood
Defendant:
Ryan K Desmond, James Berrong, Tony Crisp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Crisp et al v. Jefferson County Justice Center et al (JRG1)
as 3:2018cv00451
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D Connor, Regina Crisp and Ronnie L Crisp, Jr
Defendant:
Jefferson County Justice Center and Mountainview Treatment Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crisp v. Neel-Wilson et al
as 2:2015cv01265
Plaintiff:
Calvin Crisp
Defendant:
Trish Neel-Wilson and Michael V. Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony Brown v. University Of Kentucky, et al
as 13-5731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT & TRAINING SERVICES, VINCENT GEREMIA, ANGELA ESTEP and others
Anthony Brown v. University Of Kentucky, et al
as 13-5500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT & TRAINING SERVICES, VINCENT GEREMIA, ANGELA ESTEP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
