Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Klopp v. Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
William Klopp
Defendant:
Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board, Justin Mitchell, Sarah Weedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Fox et al v. City of Jackson, Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv11298
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Fox, Michael Wisniewski and Oswego View, LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Michigan, Daniel Mahoney, Arlene Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Guptill v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Miles Guptill
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga and Joel Gunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00396
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
