Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Shaw v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02309
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Deshuna Shaw
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Memphis Police Internal Affairs Bureau, Tennessee Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. J. et al
as 4:2023cv12549
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Howard
Defendant:
Seifert J., Jason Singleton, Canton Police Department and others
Flanagain et al v. The Home Depot USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv12669
Plaintiff:
William Flanagain and Karen Flanagain
Defendant:
The Home Depot USA, Inc, The Home Depot, Kevin Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Bowman v. Penske Truck Leasing et al
as 3:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Bowman
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Co. L.P., Shane Spradin, Home Depot Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hill v. State Farm et al
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Hill
Defendant:
State Farm, TDCI, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
