Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv11447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
State of Tennessee et al v. Haslam et al
as 3:2014cv00353
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee and Herbert S. Moncier
Defendant:
Bill Haslam , Mark Goins , Robert E. Cooper, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Harris v. Bernstein et al
as 2:2010cv11384
Plaintiff:
John Isaac Harris
Defendant:
Richard Bernstein, Tina Abbott, Eugene Driker and others
Gamel et al v. Cincinnati, City of et al
as 1:2009cv00927
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Gamel, Sr., Donald C. Beets, Kevin A. Shepard and others
Defendant:
Cincinnati, City of, Mark Mallory, Cecil L. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Thomas v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 4:2009cv01567
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. Thomas
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Elyria Jail, Mahoning County Correction Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. P'Pool et al
as 4:2008cv00130
Plaintiff:
Daphane L. Thomas
Defendant:
J. Todd P'Pool and Hopkins County, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
