Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Washington et al
as 4:2020cv00180
Defendant:
Roy Washington and Jason Woosley
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. Hamilton County Government et al
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Daniel Wilkey, Tyler Shane McRae, Hamilton County and others
Plaintiff:
KGJ, a minor child, Jennifer Johnson and Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ciotti et al v. Lorain City School District et al
as 1:2019cv00073
Defendant:
David Hardy, Jr., Mark Ballard, Lorain City School District Board of Education and others
Plaintiff:
Autumn Claire Ciotti and Shannon Ciotti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Watson et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Defendant:
Watson, Michael H Watson, Elizabeth P. Deavers and others
Plaintiff:
Smith and Reverend Regina Junior Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv13343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mitchell v. City of Dayton, Ohio et al
as 3:2014cv00198
Plaintiff:
Katherine Mitchell
Defendant:
City of Dayton, Ohio , John Syx , Michael Johnson and others
Counter_claimant:
City of Dayton, Ohio
Counter_defendant:
Katherine Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Human Relations Commission et al
as 3:2014cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Human Relations Commission, Carolyn Miller Cooper and Martha Lawfer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
