Cases 1 - 10 of 16
v. Carson
as 2:2024cv12389
Defendant:
Steven Marcel Carson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Carson v. Lamont Gibson, et al
as 2:2024cv12391
Defendant:
Lamont Gibson and Christopher Young
Plaintiff:
Steven Marcel Carson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02581
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Manis v. City of Wooster et al
as 5:2015cv02003
Plaintiff:
Marcel Manis
Defendant:
City of Wooster, Matthew Simon, Michael Jewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANTOOTH v. MULLINS et al (TV2)
as 2:2012cv00370
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARCELL MANTOOTH
Defendant:
KATHY TRENT MULLINS , LAURA A. MANTOOTH , MITZI L. SWEET and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boddie v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv02872
Plaintiff:
Quintonio Boddie
Defendant:
United States of America, Marcel Mills, Gerald Stipanek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
William Vajk, et al v. City of Iron River, et al
as 11-1446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM J. VAJK and GLORIA C. VAJK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF IRON RIVER, ROGER ZANON, City Council Member, THOMAS KING, City Council Member and others
Jimmy Morris v. United States Bankruptcy Court, et al
as 10-6443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY MARCELL MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, et al
Morris v. United States Bankruptcy Court, et al
as 3:2010cv00980
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Marcell Morris
Defendant:
United States Bankruptcy Court, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Gillentine et al
as 1:2010cv01014
Plaintiff:
Roshawn Marcell Carroll
Defendant:
Robert Gillentine, Eaton, County of and Mark Wriggelsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
