Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Davis v. PC Investment Properties LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Deborah L. Davis
Defendant:
PC Investment Properties LLC, Liberty Holdings Management LLC, Poovindran Pillay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Barnett v. Hawkins County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Hawkins County, Tennessee, Michael Martin, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Mitsubishi Chemical Performance Polymers, Inc.
as 2:2015cv12396
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Chemical Performance Polymers, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez et al v. Lusardi et al
as 2:2010cv00142
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gonzalez , Theresa Principata , Betsy Miller and others
Defendant:
Michael Lusardi, Joshua Bornhorn, Fulton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 10-5052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others
Michael Martin v. Joseph Schutzman, et al
as 09-6363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH SCHUTZMAN and DAN GOODENOUGH
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 09-6082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 09-5093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others
Martin v. Huron Valley Ambulance, Incorporated
as 2:2008cv13680
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Huron Valley Ambulance, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Martin v. Huron Valley Ambulance, Incorporated
as 2:2008cv13679
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Huron Valley Ambulance, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
