Cases 1 - 10 of 150
United States of America v. Citizens for a Pro-Life Society, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024cv00893
Defendant:
Clara McDonald, Jay Smith, Citizens for a Pro-Life Society, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hutton v. U.S. Dept of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2024cv00198
Defendant:
Aliba Larkin, Bess Poar, Cantia Ferrum and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald H Hutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
West v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
William Troy West
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Unknown Nevins, Nicholas Calati and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bernard Howard v. Dale Collins, et al
as 24-1079
Plaintiff:
BERNARD HOWARD
Defendant:
REGINALD HARVEL, DALE COLLINS, WILLIAM RICE and others
Larry Smith v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1030
Plaintiff:
LARRY SMITH
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI, ROBERT J. DONALDSON, MONICA CHILDS and others
Larry Smith v. Wayne County, MI, et al
as 24-1031
Plaintiff:
LARRY SMITH
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, MI and MONICA CHILDS
Mawule Tepe v. Whirlpool Customer Experience Center, et al
as 23-6085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
WHIRLPOOL CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE CENTER, aka Whirlpool cXc, PATTON MUSICK, MONICA J. CULPEPPER and others
Mawule Tepe v. USA, et al
as 23-6086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CURTIS L. COLLIER, United States District Court Judge, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, United States District Court Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
