Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ralph Smith v. David Silvernail, et al
as 24-3187
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BLAINE SMITH and RALPH BLAINE SMITH
Defendant:
DAVID SILVERNAIL, in his personal and official capacities, CITY OF PICKERINGTON, OH, FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OH and others
Smith Land Company, Inc, et al v City of Fairlawn, Ohio, et al
as 5:2021cv01848
Plaintiff:
Smith Land Company, Inc and Robert G. Smith
Defendant:
City of Fairlawn, Ohio, Mayor William J. Roth, Chris Randles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv14328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Smith v. Kline et al
as 5:2016cv02128
Plaintiff:
Robert G Smith
Defendant:
David Kline , City of Tallmadge, Ohio , John Tucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garner et al v. Harrod et al
as 2:2013cv00678
Plaintiff:
Cameron D. Garner , Christina L. Garner , Audrey M. Moreland and others
Defendant:
Jessica Harrod, Licking County Department of Job and Family Services, Children Services Division, John Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Smith et al
as 2:2011cv00277
Plaintiff:
Dorothea Reynolds
Defendant:
Robert W Smith, Ginine Trim, Sheri Duffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-5638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
