Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 171 - 180 of 99,873
Johnson v. Vandyke et al
as 3:2024cv00204
Plaintiff: Thaddeus Johnson
Defendant: FNU Vandyke, FNU Brock, J Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02292
Petitioner: Terry Reed
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gomez-Castro v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02297
Petitioner: Luis Gomez-Castro
Respondent: C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Simmons v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner: Adam Lee Simmons
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Farmer v. Parris
as 3:2024cv00563
Petitioner: Keith Lemont Farmer
Respondent: Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff: Kimberly M. Williams
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00560
Petitioner: Toby Whitaker
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Carter v. Michael Burgess
as 24-1396
Petitioner: THOMAS TYRONE CARTER
Respondent: MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Feltner v. Kentucky River Regional Authority et al
as 6:2024cv00059
Executor: Kendra Feltner
Defendant: Kentucky River Regional Authority, Kentucky River Regional Jail, Inc., Perry County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. King et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00465
Petitioner: Carli Carpenter
Respondent: Chris King, Kym Worthy, Patricia Penman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?