Cases 11 - 20 of 60
McDaniel v. Henderson
as 3:2022cv02051
Petitioner:
shannon Mcdaniel
Respondent:
Warden and Warden Kimberly Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. K. Cauley, et al
as 22-5998
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BOP OFFICER K. CAULEY, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity, CAMP ADMINISTRATOR THOMAS, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity, ASSISTANT WARDEN HALL, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity and others
McDaniel v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2022cv03802
Plaintiff:
eric allen and shannon mcdaniel
Defendant:
ANNETE CHAMBERS-SMITH, JOSETTE oKEREKE, Lieutenant Unknown Causey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Cauley et al
as 2:2022cv02611
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
K. Cauley, Asst. Warden Hall, Camp Admin Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Adkisson et al v. Welch et al
as 3:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Larry M Adkisson, James T Buchanan, Jad Mubarak and others
Defendant:
Karen Welch, Larenda D McCormick, Michael W Parris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arlinghaus v. Campbell County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Executor:
Debbie Arlinghaus
Defendant:
Campbell County Detention Center, James Daley, Mark Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McDaniel v. Black
as 1:2021cv02389
Petitioner:
Arthur McDaniel
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDaniel v. Wright et al
as 5:2021cv12723
Plaintiff:
Christopher McDaniel
Defendant:
M. Elizabeth Wright and A. Benn
Cook et al v. Yost et al
as 3:2021cv01544
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cook and Limitless Existence, LLC
Defendant:
Dave Yost, Annette Smith-Chambers, Tom McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
