Cases 11 - 20 of 901
Burchfield v. Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Robert W Burchfield
Defendant:
Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility, Corporal Reece LNU, Nurse Jones LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Darryl Smith
Defendant:
Anette Chambers-Smith, Timothy McConahay, James Kennard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson #182351 v. Bush et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
James Robinson #182351
Defendant:
Jermey Bush, James Corrigan, K. Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Nathaniel S Robinson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson #462832 v. Macauley et al
as 1:2024cv00210
Petitioner:
Isaiah Robinson #462832
Respondent:
Matt Macauley, William Zeerip, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TYRRELL and ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE ROBINSON, WILLIAM CHARLES VALKEMA, CRESTON JEROME HICKS and others
Jackie Robinson v. Stephen Reynolds
as 24-3147
Petitioner:
JACKIE ROBINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN STEPHEN REYNOLDS
Robinson #602273 v. Hitchingham et al
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Albert Reginald Robinson #602273
Defendant:
Unknown Hitchingham, Unknown Silliman, Unknown Kissell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenzo Wilson v. Brandon Robinson, et al
as 24-5091
Plaintiff:
LORENZO LANDELL WILSON
Defendant:
BRANDON ROBINSON, BRIAN DAVID GOULDY, DERRICK DAUGHERTY and others
Terrence Robinson-Bey v. Kenneth Black
as 24-3099
Petitioner:
TERRENCE LEMAR ROBINSON-BEY
Respondent:
KENNETH BLACK, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
