Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Harrison v. Crick et al
as 5:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Jason D. Bambel, Shelbi Helton, Peggy Adams and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White et al v. Trump et al
as 5:2019cv00119
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Frank Doyle, Sergeant Short and others
Plaintiff:
Jason R. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vaughan v. Grate et al
as 3:2019cv00177
Defendant:
Jonathon Grate, Ashley Short, Chris Kleymeyer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Short v. WARDEN CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 3:2019cv00052
Petitioner:
Duane Short
Respondent:
WARDEN CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vaughan v. Erwin et al
as 1:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Michael Vaughan
Defendant:
James Erwin, Rodney Ballard, Kimberly Potter-Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covert v. Batsch et al
as 1:2017cv00653
Plaintiff:
Glenn Covert
Defendant:
Steven Batsch, Michael Wilson, Rachel Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Short v. Carter County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
Scott Wayne Short
Defendant:
Carter County Jail, Medical Staff, Megueses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Short v. Miller
as 1:2016cv01918
Petitioner:
Christopher Short
Respondent:
Michelle Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Short v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2016cv00743
Petitioner:
Christopher Short
Respondent:
Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Angelo Fears, et al v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3149
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO FEARS, RICHARD BAYS, ALVA E. CAMPBELL, JR. and others
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY C. MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
