Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Spring v. Richardson et al
as 2:2021cv00007
Defendant:
Officer Richardson, Unknown Arresting Officers, Officer McKibbin and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derek Spring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spring v. Brandyshawn
as 4:2018cv02920
Respondent:
Warden Harris Brandyshawn and Warden Brandeshawn Harris
Petitioner:
Jeffrey M. Spring and Jeffrey M. Spring, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eric Springs v. USA
as 16-6425
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERIC LEBRON SPRINGS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
James Stevens v. Michael Grafos, et al
as 14-2350
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES STEVENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL GRAFOS, C.O., all are sued in both capacities, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as John Doe, Sgt John Doe, et Al, all are sued in both capacities, DALE GRIBLER, Sheriff and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STACEY MATTHEWS, C.O.
Snow v. Leveridge et al
as 1:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jonas Lee Snow
Defendant:
Matthew Leveridge, Kevin Shearer, Russell County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snow v. Leveridge et al
as 6:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jonas Lee Snow
Defendant:
Matthew Leveridge, Kevin Shearer, Russell County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dankert v. Camp Brighton Prison et al
as 2:2014cv10692
Plaintiff:
Spring Dankert
Defendant:
Camp Brighton Prison, CBI and Health Inspectors
James Stevens v. Michael Grafos, et al
as 13-2422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES STEVENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL GRAFOS, et al
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY GUMINSKI, Sgt., aka Unknown Guminiski, VIRG FRANKS, Sgt., STACEY MATTHEWS, C.O. and others
Springs v. USA
as 1:2013cv00341
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Eric Lebron Springs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Adames v. Edenfield et al
as 5:2011cv00424
Petitioner:
Santos Adames
Respondent:
Karen Edenfield, Stoles, J. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
