Cases 21 - 30 of 437
Rush v. Lincoln County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen Rush
Defendant:
Lincoln County Jail, Vicky Afisov, Chris Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jenkins #962092 v. Aspirus Eye Clinic et al
as 2:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jenkins #962092
Defendant:
Aspirus Eye Clinic and Shalen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevonte Jenkins v. Kimberly Clipper
as 23-3845
Petitioner / Appellant:
TREVONTE JENKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY CLIPPER, Warden
Collins v. Artis et al
as 2:2023cv12570
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Collins
Defendant:
Fredeane Artis, Mark McDonald, Woods and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Cooper v. Chambers Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01793
Plaintiff:
Keith Cooper
Defendant:
Annett Chambers Smith, Governor Mike DeWine, Doctor Eddie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00972
Petitioner:
Eric Jenkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jenkins v. Warden, Lawrence County Common Pleas
as 1:2023cv00560
Petitioner:
Homer J. Jenkins
Respondent:
Warden, Lawrence County Common Pleas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Butler et al
as 3:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
Martin Robinson
Defendant:
Ohio State Patrol Lonnie Butler, V. Brown Legal Services, OH Dept. of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODR&C) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv02384
Petitioner:
Eric Tyrone Jenkins
Respondent:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
