Cases 21 - 30 of 165
Sims v. Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
as 2:2022cv04357
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Sims
Defendant:
Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Captain Forley, Major-Chief of Security John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Bracy
as 1:2022cv02122
Petitioner:
Jerry Sims, Jr.
Respondent:
Charmaine Bracy and Warden Charmaine Bracy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. El Paso County Jail Deputy et al
as 3:2022cv00803
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
El Paso County Jail Deputy, f/n/u Holder, H. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White #690863 v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv00643
Plaintiff:
Valden Devone White #690863
Defendant:
Scott Miller, Unknown Blair, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2022cv00077
Petitioner:
David A. Sims
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darren Johnson v. Sims, et al
as 22-1530
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREN DEON JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SIMS, FOOD SERVICE DIRECTOR COFELT, FOOD SERVICE STAFF BERLINGER and others
Sims v. Tennessee, State of
as 3:2022cv00284
Petitioner:
Ronnie D. Sims, Jr.
Respondent:
Tennessee, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Sims et al
as 4:2022cv10659
Plaintiff:
Darren Johnson
Defendant:
Sims, Cofelt, Berlinger and others
Boles #156632 v. Sims et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Boles #156632, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Sims and Unknown Severn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. State of et al
as 3:2021cv00916
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Sims, Jr.
Defendant:
State of, Wesley King and Steve R. Dozier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
