Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 7,460
Ward v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff: Leah Joy Ward
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston #235170 v. Bonn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00588
Plaintiff: Harvey Preston #235170
Defendant: John Bonn, Santiago Davis, Donald Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vladimir Brik v. C. McConnell, et al
as 24-3481
Plaintiff: VLADIMIR VLADIMIROVICH BRIK
Defendant: NURSE C. MCCONNELL, DOCTOR JOHN DUNLOP and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JAMES NESSLE
Curran v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00691
Petitioner: John F. Curran
Respondent: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petersmark v. Christiansen
as 2:2024cv11464
Petitioner: Joseph Robert Petersmark
Respondent: J. Christiansen, Hedi E. Washington and John Christiansen
Shockley v. Sweet et al
as 4:2024cv11462
Plaintiff: Clifton D. Shockley
Defendant: Sweet, Clemmons, Schirmer and others
Jacobs v. David et al
as 5:2024cv11463
Plaintiff: William Edwin Jacobs
Defendant: David, Frangedakis, Branch and others
Jerry v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff: Aonrai C. Jerry #614415
Defendant: Heidi E. Washington, John Davis, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy Sutton, III v. Scott Wriggelsworth, et al
as 24-1483
Plaintiff: ROY EUGENE SUTTON, III
Defendant: SCOTT WRIGGELSWORTH, Sheriff, in official and personal capacity, JOHN DOE, Health Care Worker, in official and personal capacity and GLEN CIPULLO, Medical Doctor/Provider, in official and personal capacity
Shoemaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00686
Plaintiff: Michelle Shoemaker
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips, Tennessee Department of Correction and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?