Cases 21 - 30 of 340
Cook v. Peters et al.
as 3:2023cv02210
Plaintiff:
William H Cook, III
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Gregory Patton, S. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Peters et al.
as 3:2023cv02214
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Christopher Bina, Warden David Lemaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davis v. T.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Jeffery M Davis
Defendant:
T.D.O.C., Sgt. White, Ginger Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bellman #314047 v. Mikel et al
as 1:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
Randy Bellman #314047
Defendant:
Nathan Mikel, Unknown Oullette, Unknown McIntosh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv02636
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Merrick Garland, Collette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darvin v. Heritage (Meat-by-product Distributor) et al
as 2:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Michael Darvin
Defendant:
Heritage (Meat-by-product Distributor), Bledsoe County Correctional Complex, Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv02506
Petitioner:
James Mays, III
Defendant:
Collette Peters
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bobo v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02498
Petitioner:
Travis D. Bobo
Respondent:
Freddie Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKinney v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02437
Petitioner:
Charles E. McKinney
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
