Cases 21 - 30 of 304
Watson v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv00919
Petitioner:
Jamarces J. Watson
Respondent:
West Tennessee State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith Mustin v. Lyneal Wainwright, et al
as 23-3671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH MUSTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LYNEAL WAINWRIGHT, Warden, in her individual and official capacity, RANDON WATSON, in his individual capacity, BLAIR SMITH, in his individual and official capacity and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Crowley #704755 v. Leach et al
as 2:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Serlanding Crowley #704755, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Leach, Marquette Branch Prison, Unknown Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson #622337 v. Surety et al
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Andre Jackson #622337
Defendant:
Unknown Surety, Unknown Bensel, A. Hetrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lask v. Watson
as 3:2023cv01381
Petitioner:
Richard Lask
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramone Wright v. Michael Watson
as 23-3559
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMONE L. WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL H. WATSON
Robert Reynolds v. Peter Watson, et al
as 23-1586
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE-LAMAR REYNOLDS
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER WATSON, Nurse practitioner; individually, personal, and official capacities, R. YARN, Medical provider; individually, personal, and official capacities, VICKI SHERBROOK, Registered nurse; individually, personal, and official capacities and others
Stafford v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lee Stafford
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Jim Hammond, QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Watson
as 3:2023cv00861
Petitioner:
James M. Howard
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
